Normally, there is a lag when moving on the main menu on low-profile devices Graphics error occurs on low-profile devices, occasionally reducing FPS when playing heavy graphics games. Smooth, stable FPS, with lag phenomenon on low-profile machines. The test configuration in the article is CPU Core i3 8100, 4GB RAM and SVGA 3D graphics memory on VMWare virtual machine. Here, summarizes and compares the differences on BlueStacks and NoxPlayer. At this point, NoxPlayer does not yet support but we can still play MOBA games with NoxPlayer but it must be customized manually and take a bit of time to set up. on the simulator easier thanks to the application's available button settings. MOBA mode on BlueStacks is one of the bright features to help players of MOBA games like Mobile Union, Legend Of Ace. BlueStacks occasionally chooses frames but still works fine on low-profile devices. In the process of running the application, NoxPlayer sometimes generates graphics errors and lag occurs. Through two comparison images, we can see that NoxPlayer consumes more resources (RAM, CPU). The results measured by Task Manager are as follows: In my test, I took the Subway Surfer game as an example and configured the hardware for two applications: 2 core CPU with 1000MB RAM.
Data in the article is for reference only and conform to the machine configuration in the article. Note: The time it takes to start up quickly or slowly depends on your PC configuration. To measure the time to start and close the application, I ran two software via VMWare virtual machine with the following configuration:Īnd the time I measured is as follows (from the time the application opens and the home screen loads) The interface on NoxPlayer is built in the direction of the original Android interface while the interface on BlueStacks is built and optimized according to user experience. The interface of the two software is designed quite differently. In addition, BlueStacks software also has data folder located at C: ProgramData with quite high capacity, ranging from 4 - 5 GB.
The following is a comparative image of the pre and post capacity level of BlueStacks and NoxPlayer.ĭownloadable installer capacity from home page (left is BlueStacks and right is NoxPlayer)Īfter installation (the left is the NoxPlayer folder and the right is the BlueStacks folder) Compare capacity before and after installation Minimum configuration of NoxPlayer and BlueStacks If you want to download BlueStacks and NoxPlayer software, please download at the link below. Let's analyze about these two software in the following article to see which software is worth installing Android emulator on our device! In the list of best android emulators, BlueStack and NoxPlayer are the names that attract the most attention.
0 kommentar(er)
